Apathy in MCI May Herald Conversion to Alzheimer’s
The presence of apathy may predict conversion from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer’s disease (AD), new research suggests.
Investigators followed more than 1000 individuals with MCI over an 8-year period. During that time, close to one fifth converted from MCI to AD. Of those with apathy, 36% developed AD versus 14% of those without apathy. Moreover, conversion to AD was more rapid in those with apathy versus those without — a median of almost 4 years compared with a median of almost 7 years.
“The take-home message for clinicians is that apathy is associated with neurodegenerative diseases,” senior author Antonio Teixeira, MD, PhD, professor of psychiatry and head of the neuropsychiatry program, McGovern Medical School, UTHealth, Houston, Texas, told Medscape Medical News.
“If a person starts developing apathy it could either prompt further investigation or at least closer following,” he said.
The study was published online March 7 in the Journal of Alzheimer‘s Disease.
Approximately 80% of patients with MCI go on to develop AD within a 6-year period, the investigators note. “Given the impact of AD, it is paramount to define parameters associated with distinct trajectories of MCI patients, especially identifying those who are more prone to develop AD.”
Teixeira defined apathy as “loss of interest and reduction in goal-directed behaviors.”
Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are reported in an estimated 35% to 85% of patients with MCI and also are often present in the early stages of AD, preceding the onset of measurable cognitive decline. Previous research suggests that NPS — including apathy — may predict conversion from MCI to dementia.
However, previous research “did not specifically evaluate the role of moderating factors,” such as age or MCI type. Moreover, previous studies have been conducted in primarily non-Hispanic White populations, “limiting the generalizability of the findings.”
The researchers therefore turned to subjects enrolled in the Texas Alzheimer’s Research and Care Consortium (TARCC) — a cohort with a significant percentage of Hispanic participants — to explore conversion rates for MCI to AD and determine the predictive role of apathy in the progression from MCI to AD.
TARCC is a state-funded longitudinal multisite study consisting of a cohort of adults ≥ 50 years old who are noncognitively impaired, patients with MCI, and patients with AD.
“A major novelty of our study is that we used a heterogeneous population with a significant percentage of Hispanic research subjects,” said Teixeira.
Family members/caregivers completed the Neuropsychiatry Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q) and participants underwent a battery of cognitive tests, including the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE).
The study included 1092 individuals diagnosed with MCI at any time point during the study (59% women; mean [SD] age, 71.8 [8.6] years; mean years of education, 12.6 [4.4]). The cohort was evenly divided between Hispanic and non-Hispanic participants.
Of the total cohort, 158 individuals had apathy and 934 did not.
Researchers performed a total of 2897 observations, with the number of observations ranging from 1 to 9 per individual and a median observation count per participant of 2 (interquartile range: 1, 4).
Participants were followed for 8.2 years.
Efficient and Scalable
During the study period, 17.3% of participants experienced conversion from MCI to AD across all observations, with a median time-to-conversion of 6.4 years.
A higher percentage of participants with apathy experienced conversion to AD, compared to individuals without apathy (36.1% vs 14.2%, respectively). The median time-to-conversion was also much shorter in those with versus without apathy (3.8 vs 6.8 years, respectively).
In the univariate analysis (not adjusted for covariates), several predictors of interest were found to be significantly related to time-to-conversion (male sex, older age, amnestic type MCI, and depression, as well as lower MMSE scores and non-Hispanic ethnicity) (P < .05).
However, individuals who had apathy “demonstrated a 2.40-fold greater hazard of conversion, relative to those who did not have apathy.”
Researchers stratified the severity of apathy using a 4-level index, beginning with “no apathy” and going through “mild,” moderate,” and “severe” apathy. The presence of apathy was significantly related to the outcome, with the relationship increasing in tandem with greater severity (Table 1).
Table 1. Apathy Severity and Relationship to Outcome
|Apathy Severity||Relationship to Outcome, Hazard Ratio||P value|
Moderation models found that age had a significant moderating effect (adjusted P = .002). For those who had apathy, the relationship between age and time-to-conversion was “essentially null.” However, for those without apathy, there was a 5% increase in the hazard of conversion per additional year of age (P < .001).
In adjusted and unadjusted models, MMSE score showed a moderating effect (P < .001), but the effect was stronger in those with versus without apathy (hazard ratio, 0.75 vs 0.87, respectively; both P < .001).
“Our results showed that MCI patients with apathy have significantly higher conversion rates to AD compared with MCI patients without apathy, even after adjustment for confounding factors,” the investigators write.
Teixeira noted that there is “overlap” between depression and apathy, but not all people with depression experience apathy, and all apathy is not necessarily related to depression, “which is why we controlled for depression.”
He observed that many clinicians treat patients with apathy by prescribing antidepressants. “But the apathy may not necessarily be associated with depression, and antidepressants might even make it worse. It’s important to tease out apathy from depression,” he said.
Assessing apathy may be an “efficient and highly scalable method for improving risk stratification across clinical and research settings,” the researchers note.
One of Many Factors
Commenting on the study for Medscape Medical News, Claire Sexton, DPhil, senior director of scientific programs and outreach, Alzheimer’s Association, said: “A strength of this research is that the study population is significantly more diverse than previous work on this topic.”
However, “the study also has a number of limitations, including short follow-up time and diagnosis that did not include measurement of key biomarkers; therefore, for these findings to have a high level of credibility they need to be replicated in more rigorous studies,” said Sexton, who was not involved with the study.
“Based on the totality of research, it is still very likely that apathy is only one of many factors that influence the rate of progression from MCI to Alzheimer’s dementia,” she added.
She noted that the Alzheimer’s Association “believes that it is important for clinicians — and family caregivers — to monitor for and manage behavioral and neuropsychiatric symptoms, including apathy, throughout the disease course,” which “can be an important part of maintaining or improving everyone’s quality of life.”
This study was supported by the Texas Alzheimer ‘ s Research and Care Consortium. Teixeira, other study authors, and Sexton have reported no relevant financial relationships.
J Alzheimers Dis. Published online March 7, 2023. Abstract
Batya Swift Yasgur, MA, LSW is a freelance writer with a counseling practice in Teaneck, NJ. She is a regular contributor to numerous medical publications, including Medscape and WebMD, and is the author of several consumer-oriented health books as well as Behind the Burqa: Our Lives in Afghanistan and How We Escaped to Freedom (the memoir of two brave Afghan sisters who told her their story).
For more Medscape Neurology news, join us on Facebook and Twitter.
Source: Read Full Article